Tensions have escalated within the East African Legislative Assembly (EALA) as applicants challenge the recent swearing-in of certain members allegedly nominated illegally by the President of the Federal Republic of Somalia.The matter has now moved to the East African Court of Justice (EACJ), First Instance Division, in Arusha, raising concerns about governance, legal compliance, and regional cohesion within the East African Community (EAC).The case, referenced as No. 45 of 2025, lists Amb. Mohamed Ahmed Awil and another as applicants, with the Federal Republic of Somalia and EALA as respondents.According to a court notice, the scheduling conference for the case has been set for Thursday, March 19, 2026, at 9:30 a.m. before a bench comprising five judges, including Principal Judge Yohane Bokobora Masara and Deputy Principal Justice Richard Wejuli, at the EAC Headquarters in Arusha.The applicants have expressed deep concern over what they describe as violations of legal processes and disregard for judicial authority by EALA leadership.They argue that the swearing-in of certain members bypassed procedures outlined in the EAC Treaty, raising serious questions about the legitimacy of the appointments.“Such actions undermine the rule of law and the credibility of both judicial and legislative institutions in the region,” the applicants stated in a press release dated March 16, 2026.They also warned that these developments could erode trust among member states, potentially creating a crisis of confidence in the EAC.The applicants called for stronger accountability mechanisms within both EALA and the broader East African Community, emphasizing that all actions must reflect democratic principles, transparency, and respect for established legal frameworks.The upcoming scheduling conference is expected to determine the procedural steps for the case, with the court noting that absence of parties will not prevent proceedings from continuing.Legal analysts say the outcome of this case could have long-term implications for governance within the EAC and set important precedents for respecting judicial authority in regional legislative matters.Amb. Awil and his co-applicant contend that failure to adhere to legal procedures not only threatens individual appointments but also the stability and cohesion of the East African Community as a whole. “Continuous undermining of the treaty and judicial authority could affect the EAC’s effectiveness and unity,” the statement read.The case has drawn attention across the region, with legal experts emphasizing that it underscores the need for strict compliance with treaty provisions and the importance of respecting court orders to maintain confidence in regional institutions.
